The overt manifestation of a social problem is usually the tip of
the iceberg signaling the problem’s existence but not its causes.
(UNICEF, 1996) A phenomenon such as child labor should be
understood as a symptom of a deeper and more complex situation
within a particular societal context.
In recent years research in Egypt sought to identify the
factors involved in causing child deprivation. Few research
projects concentrated on the factors involved in the proliferation
of child labor. Research findings indicate a clear link between
aspects of child deprivation – in fact deprivation of basic child
rights – and child labor. Numerous studies have identified a
triangular relationship between poverty, deprivation of education,
and various forms of child vulnerability including child labor. A
review of research findings sheds light on the nature and the root
causes of child deprivation which are conducive to child labor.
Few research projects assessed the causes which contribute to
children’s early participation in the work force. The
Child Labor in Egypt Survey (1991)
highlighted the importance of differentiating between causal
factors and incidents or conditions which merely "facilitate" the
occurrence of a phenomenon. Such is the case of low technological
levels in industry which provide a suitable environment for the
perpetuation of child labor.
The reasons for working as stated by a sample of working
children under age 15 indicate that educational failure and the
desire to learn a profession were the most significant causes
among boys. For girls, economic factors were the most compelling
reasons for work.
|
|
Reason* |
Male % |
Female % |
|
Educational failure |
52.6 |
18.9 |
Learn a profession |
47.8 |
18.9 |
Contribute to family income |
43.3 |
66.0 |
Earn own money |
34.5 |
58.5 |
Other |
5.5 |
18.9 |
*The respondents were permitted to state more than one reason.
Data from Child Labor in Egypt
Survey (1991)
In explaining why their children worked, parents questioned
whether basic education was relevant for providing their
children’s need to gain experience. Others complained of the
burden of school expenses.
Family economic pressures come out clearly in the study.
Results indicated that a child’s contribution to the family budget
ranged on average between 22.8% (mothers’ estimates) and 30.7%
(children’s estimates).
Female-headed households are often among the most vulnerable
groups and rely to a great extent on child labor as a source of
income. The table below compares female-headed and two-parent
households. For children from female-headed households, economic
factors were much more important reasons for work. These findings
are indicative of the vulnerability of female-headed households, a
fact which calls for policy consideration.
|
|
Reason* |
Children in Female-Headed Households % |
Children in Two-Parent Households % |
|
Contribute to family income |
61.8 |
39.9 |
Earn own money |
43.6 |
33.0 |
Educational failure |
42.3 |
49.6 |
Learn a profession |
38.5 |
45.2 |
Other |
5.1 |
6.7 |
*The respondents were permitted to state more than one reason.
Data from Child Labor in Egypt
Survey (1991)
Data from the Social and Health Status and
Educational Achievement of Adolescents in Egypt Survey (ASCE)
(1998) indicate that for working adolescents (10-19 years),
the most important reason for work was to help the family (without
pay). This pattern is prevalent in rural areas where children and
adolescents work in family cultivation.
|
|
Reasons |
% |
|
Help family without pay |
36 |
Provide income for family |
19 |
Has spare time |
16 |
Cover own needs |
9 |
Likes to work |
9 |
To gain experience |
6 |
Poor scholastic performance |
5 |
Data from Social and Health Status and
Educational Achievement of Adolescents in Egypt Survey (ASCE)
(1998) |