Table of
Contents
►
Definition of Governance, Good
Governance and a Proposed Framework for
Good Governance
►
From another point of View: UNDP work on Governance
►
Engendering Economic Governance
►
Special Issues
Definition of Governance, Good
Governance and a Proposed Framework for
Good Governance
Governance is the exercise of
political, economic and administrative
authority to manage a nation's affairs.
It is the complex mechanisms, processes,
relationships and institutions through
which citizens and groups articulate
their interests, exercise their rights
and obligations and mediate their
differences. Governance encompasses
every institutions and organization in
the society, from the family to the
state and embraces all methods - good
and bad - that societies use to
distribute power and manage public
resources and problems. Good governance
is therefore a subset of governance,
wherein public resources and problems
are managed effectively, efficiently and
in response to critical needs of
society. Effective democratic forms of
governance rely on public participation,
accountability and transparency
A broad conceptual framework for good
governance, whether in political or
economic decision-making includes six
components:
1. Leaders/Decision makers
Since women often lack access to the
traditional sources of knowledge,
capacity-building and experience
(mentoring) that generate men leaders,
leadership training is especially
important for women. This is especially
the case in relation to economic
decision-making, where women tend to
believe -sometimes mistakenly - that
male leaders are better equipped with
technical understanding of the relevant
issues.
2. Constituencies:
Active and empowered constituencies
must be aware of and able to exercise
their basic human rights, as well as
sufficiently informed about issues and
supported by access to relevant
information in order to develop a clear
agenda.
3. An Agenda:
Women's leadership has sometimes
been unfocused and support from the
constituency lacking because of the lack
of an agreed agenda on which both can
focus. This is a particular gap for
economic governance, where both women
leaders and the women's constituency
often feel that they lack technical
understanding of the issues.
4. Institutions:
The institutions of governance must
be generally open to public scrutiny and
subject to accountability through a
democratic political system.
5. Information:
"Good" decisions can only be made if
both decision makers and their
constituencies have access and are able
to make appropriate use of "good"
information.
6. Accountability Processes:
Institutionalized monitoring and
accountability mechanisms enable
constituencies to hold their leaders and
Government to account.
From another point of View: UNDP
work on Governance
Governance can be seen as the
exercise of economic, political and
administrative authority to manage a
country's affairs at all levels. It
comprises the mechanisms, processes and
institutions through which citizens and
groups articulate their interests,
exercise their legal rights, meet their
obligations and mediate their
differences.
Good governance is, among other things,
participatory, transparent and
accountable. It is also effective and
equitable, and promotes the rule of law
fairly. Good governance ensures that the
voices of the poorest and the most
vulnerable are heard in decision-making
over the allocation of development
resources, and that political, social
and economic priorities are based on
broad consensus among the three
stakeholders the state, private sector
and civil society. All three
stakeholders are critical for sustaining
human development: the state creates a
conducive political and legal
environment; the
private sector generates jobs and
income; and civil society facilitates
political and social interaction. With
the advent of globalization and the
integration of economies, the state's
task is also to find a balance between
taking advantage of emerging market
opportunities and providing a secure and
stable social and economic environment
domestically.
UNDP identifies nine core
characteristics covering eight key urban
issues which measure good governance.
Core characteristics of good
governance
1) Participation
All men and women should have a
voice in decision-making, either
directly or through legitimate
intermediate institutions that represent
their interests. Such broad
participation is built on freedom of
association and speech, as well as
capacities to participate constructively
2) Rule of law
Legal frameworks should be fair and
enforced impartially, particularly the
laws on
human rights
3) Transparency
Transparency is built on the free
flow of information. Processes,
institutions and information are
directly accessible to those concerned
with them, and enough information is
provided to understand and monitor them
4) Responsiveness
Institutions and processes try to
serve all stakeholders
5) Consensus orientation
Good governance mediates differing
interests to reach a broad consensus on
what is in the best interest of the
group and, where possible, on policies
and procedures
6) Equity
All men and women have opportunities
to improve or maintain their well-being
7) Effectiveness and efficiency
Processes and institutions produce
results that meet needs while making the
best use of resources
8) Accountability
Decision- makers in government, the
private sector and civil society
organisations are accountable to the
public, as well as to institutional
stakeholders. This accountability
differs depending on the organisation
and whether the decision is internal or
external to an organization
9) Strategic vision
Leaders and the public have a broad
and long-term perspective on good
governance and human development, along
with a sense of what is needed for such
development.
There is also an understanding of the
historical, cultural and social
complexities in which that perspective
is grounded
Engendering Economic Governance
Decision-makers
Economic decision-makers must be
aware of the need for, and have the
technical capacity to incorporate, a
gender perspective into policy and
programme analysis. The National Women's
Machinery and women in politics must be
able to participate effectively in
dialogues and debates on economic
policy.
Active and empowered constituencies must
be created and strengthened among women
(and men) to advocate and demand
accountability from government and
political leaders at the national and
international levels for the impact of
macroeconomic policy on women.
In a globalized world, linkages need to
be built and/or strengthened between
national and regional NGOs working on
women in politics, women in media and
women's human rights and those working
on women and trade and women and
macroeconomic policy issues
The women's economic agenda must be
generally understood by leaders and
constituencies. Other actors,
particularly key government economic
agencies and international economic
institutions, must also understand and
accept the general validity of the
conceptual basis of the women's economic
agenda.
The institutions of economic governance
must be engendered through advocacy and
their active involvement in capacity
building under the program
Appropriate data - sex-disaggregated
data and gender statistics on the
differential impact of macroeconomic
policies on women and men, particularly
in agriculture, especially unpaid farm
work and within the informal sector,
especially home-based work,
sub-contracted homework and street
vending. It should also include data on
women's and men's differential
contributions to the care economy
through domestic work, childcare, family
care and community activities.
Special Issues
►
Constraints facing the Implementation
of the Engendering of Economic
Governance especially in developing
countries and North African countries.
under construction
►
The Egyptian
Experiment on “Engendering Economic Governance”
under construction
The History of Gender Discrimination
in Egypt and its Indication on
Macroeconomic Policy
Are Egyptian Females Ready for
Leadership?
Capacity Building Programs for the
Egyptian Women?
Programs that are Successfully
Implemented
in Egypt, and are Specialized on Gender
Responsive Budgeting and Gender
Performance Auditing.
What are the Activities of UNIFEM in Egypt .
What has been Realized?.
Difficulties Encountered.?
Future plans?
The Gender Budgeting Work of the
National Council for Women (NCW) and
the Public Administration Research and
Consultation Centre (PARC) at Cairo
University in Egypt (PARC):
The following UNIFEM document
reports on the progress of Egypt within
the "Strengthening Economic Governance:
Applied Gender Analysis to Government"
programme. The programme advocates for,
and supports the engendering of economic
governance and leadership to increase
women’s participation in decision-making
processes that shape their lives, and to
respond to challenges emerging from the
processes of globalization and feminized
poverty. The report highlights some of
the outputs, activities, expected
outcomes, lessons learned and monitoring
and evaluation findings from Egypt's
country initiative.
The document (2005) details the gender
budgeting work of the National Council
for Women and the Public Administration
Research and Consultation Centre (PARC)
at Cairo University in Egypt.
http://www.gender-budgets.org/en/ev-66617-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html
|